Trump Cracking Down On Immigrant Welfare

(We did not write this Article; the original Article is HERE)

Seemingly following the proposals of Bill Clinton (and Ron Paul), The Washington Post reports that a leaked document shows the Trump administration is planning to crackdown on current, and would-be, immigrants who are likely to require public assistance.

After Bill Clinton received a standing ovation for suggesting crackdown on immigrant welfare

“We are a nation of immigrants.. but we are a nation of laws”

 

“Our nation is rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country…

 

Illegal immigrants take jobs from citizens or legal immigrants, they impose burdens on our taxpayers…

 

That is why we are doubling the number of border guards, deporting more illegal immigrants than ever before, cracking down on illegal hiring, barring benefits to illegal aliens, and we will do more to speed the deportation of illegal immigrants arrest for crimes…

 

It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws that has occurred in the last few years.. and we must do more to stop it.”

And following Ron Paul’s advice this week that the solution to really addressing the problem of illegal immigration, drug smuggling, and the threat of cross-border terrorism is clear:

Remove the welfare magnet that attracts so many to cross the border illegally, stop the 25 year US war in the Middle East, and end the drug war that incentivizes smugglers to cross the border.

 

The various taxpayer-funded programs that benefit illegal immigrants in the United States, such as direct financial transfers, medical benefits, food assistance, and education, cost an estimated $100 billion dollars per year. That is a significant burden on citizens and legal residents. The promise of free money, free food, free education, and free medical care if you cross the border illegally is a powerful incentive for people to do so. It especially makes no sense for the United States government to provide these services to those who are not in the US legally.

The Washington Post reports that The Trump administration is considering a plan to weed out would-be immigrants who are likely to require public assistance, as well as to deport — when possible — immigrants already living in the United States who depend on taxpayer help, according to a draft executive order obtained by The Washington Post.

A second draft order under consideration calls for a substantial shake up in the system through which the United States administers immigrant and nonimmigrant visas overall, with the aim of tightly controlling who enters the country, and who can enter the workforce, and to reduce the social services burden on U.S. taxpayers.

The drafts are circulating among administration officials, and it is unclear whether President Trump has decided to move forward with them or when he might sign them if he does decide to put them in place.

While Trump’s immigration ban last week focused on national security and preventing terrorism, the new draft orders would be focused on Trump’s campaign promises to protect American workers and to create jobs, immediately restricting the flow of immigrants and temporary laborers into the U.S. workforce.

The administration has blamed immigrants who end up receiving U.S. social services for eating up federal resources, and it has said immigrant workers contribute to unemployment among Americans who were born in the United States.

 

“Our country’s immigration laws are designed to protect American taxpayers and promote immigrant self sufficiency. Yet households headed by aliens are much more likely than those headed by citizens to use Federal means-tested public benefits,” reads one draft order obtained by The Post, titled “Executive Order on Protecting Taxpayer Resources by Ensuring Our Immigration Laws Promote Accountability and Responsibility.” The draft order provides no evidence to support the claim that immigrant households are more likely to use welfare benefits, and there is no consensus among experts about immigration’s impact on such benefits or American jobs.

WaPo goes on to note that the administration would be seeking to “deny admission to any alien who is likely to become a public charge” and develop standards for “determining” whether an immigrant can be deported after five years if that person receives a certain amount of public assistance, including Food Stamps, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and Medicaid.

The second order, titled “Executive Order on Protecting American Jobs and Workers by Strengthening the Integrity of Foreign Worker Visa Programs” calls for “eliminating” the “jobs magnet” that is driving illegal immigration to the United States, according to a copy obtained by The Post.

 

The order would rescind any work visa provisions for foreign nationals found not to be in “the national interest” or in violation of U.S. immigration laws.

Economists are divided on the extent to which illegal immigration impacts wages, but generally find that immigration is good for the economy, including the immigration of low-skilled workers.

“The unlawful employment of aliens has had a devastating impact on the wages and jobs of American workers, especially low-skilled, teenage, and African American and Hispanic workers,” the draft order says.

 

But the CATO Institute claims “when you compare poor immigrants to poor natives, poor immigrants are less likely to use welfare, and when they do, the dollar value of the benefits they use is lower,” and The Migration Policy Institute claims that “refugee men are employed at a higher rate than their U.S.-born peers.”

Bear in ind this is WaPo unsubstantiated reports and The White House would not confirm or deny the authenticity of the orders, and White House officials did not respond to requests for comment about the drafts on Monday and Tuesday.

 

Advertisements

CDC Knowingly LIED About Mercury In Vaccines: Proof Has Surfaced

(We did not write this Article; the original Article is HERE)

By Catherine J Frompovich

Finally it’s coming to light and the fact is being told: Vaccines given to infants contained inordinate amounts of ethylmercury in the form of Thimerosal; the CDC knew about it and conspired to keep the devastating reality of mercury damage from healthcare consumers and public health agencies. A true crime against humanity and nothing short of federal agency child abuse!

Thanks to the intrepid vaccine safety advocacy work by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his writing partner Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN, we learn,

FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) was responsible for adding up the cumulative exposure to mercury from infant vaccines, a simple calculation that, astonishingly, had never been performed by either the FDA or the CDC. When the agency finally performed that basic calculation, the regulators realized that a six month-old infant who received thimerosal-preserved vaccines following the recommended CDC vaccine schedule would have received a jaw dropping 187.5 micrograms of mercury. [1] [CJF emphasis added]

Those calculations were made back in the late 1990s and CDC officials have been covering up their voodoo vaccine consensus science ever since! Those actions should be prosecuted as crimes against humanity, including excessive child abuse by a government agency, and the CDC should be revamped from the inside out; restructured; and ‘surgically’ separated from Big Pharma.

The CDC brainwashing of the global medical profession, international health agencies and the media regarding the deceitfulness of vaccine ‘safety’ is nothing short of criminal action, which must be addressed at every level: local school districts, state health agencies, national courts globally, and the World Health Organization, a ‘mouthpiece’ of CDC’s deceitfulness and fraudulent research and health recommendations. None comes to mind more so than the CDC’s always trotting out the indicted Poul Thorsen’s infamous research that vaccines don’t cause autism!

What does mercury affect in the human body? The brain and central nervous system!

This chart represents models of mercury in blood and tissues formulated by Dr. Barry Rumack, MD, a consultant who offered “toxicologic and pharmacologic evaluation of drugs, biological and potentially toxic or hazardous agents for government and industry [1].”

1

According to Kennedy and Redwood’s article,

There was no point in time from birth to approximately 16-18 months of age that infants were below the EPA guidelines for allowable mercury exposure. In fact, according to the models, blood and body burden levels of mercury peaked at six months of age at a shockingly high level of 120ng/liter. To put this in perspective, the CDC classifies mercury poisoning as blood levels of mercury greater than 10 ng/L. [CJF emphasis]

A most egregious aspect of the cover up is what happened within the CDC, as reported:

[T]he FDA assigned a pediatrician with little knowledge of toxicology to oversee its public reporting. When Dr. Leslie Ball was asked why she reported the mercury exposure levels in this deceptive fashion, she responded, “That is what I was told to do.” [1, pg.2]

The Kennedy-Redwood article, which I highly recommend you read in full, ends with

Ignoring Etzel’s [U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Ruth Etzel, MD] wise advice, the CDC elected to paper over their catastrophic mistake and double down on vaccine mercury. By continuing to allow thimerosal to be used in vaccines, the CDC is causing harm to American pregnant women, their growing babies and to 100 million children all over the planet. And now we have proof that our regulators know exactly what they are doing.

President Trump has tasked Robert Kennedy Jr. with heading up an investigative commission regarding vaccines. Here are my concerns about:

  1. Robert Kennedy Jr. will meet up with his uncle’s and father’s fate of being shot. It’s not past vested interests to go to any lengths to protect their turf and enforce their agendas.
  2. Big Pharma will be allowed to get more than its nose under the tent during the investigation. Big Pharma should be kept in outer space with independent scientists performing all assessments.
  3. Congress must not turn a deaf ear and blind eye on what’s being uncovered, as Congress probably has more responsibility than anyone by granting vaccine makers what turned out to be a “get out of jail free” card in the vaccine law Congress passed in 1986. It must be replaced with equitable law, since the vaccine court masters do a very poor job of implementing the real intent of the law.
  4. Vaccine law in the USA must be changed to enforce consumers’ rights to sue vaccine makers individually and collectively for promoting fraudulent vaccine science; product liability disasters; child abuse; and crimes against humanity.
  5. Big Pharma and its lobbyists by law must be prohibited from lobbying Congress and federal agencies.
  6. Pregnant women should not be mandated to receive vaccines.

Nothing short of the above even can begin to rectify some of the horrors perpetrated upon several generations of children globally. California should be ashamed of itself and its SB277 [2]! Richard Pan, MD, should be struck from medical licensure and not permitted to practice.

By the way, if readers really want to know the health problems associated with many other neurotoxins and chemicals in vaccines than ethylmercury, which still is in vaccines, you may want to read my book Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines. It discusses from published peer review science and journals what those toxic ingredients do in the body.

However, I wish Robert Kennedy Jr. would also take a very serious look at microwave radiation EMFs/RFs and the non-thermal radiation wave adverse health effects they are causing. I predict they, along with G5-in-the-sky, will be worse than the autism pandemic we are experiencing in our children: one in 10,000-15,000 in the 1970s; one in 68 in the USA. Check out other countries here.

We’ve seen the demonstrations for women’s rights after the Trump inauguration. Well, isn’t it time to organize about the rights of fetuses, newborns, infants, and toddlers being subjected to apparently legal and condoned chemical child abuse which is making them the sickest demographic statistic of all time for children regarding chronic diseases.

Chronic conditions now affect 15 percent to 18 percent of children and teens, and even those estimates may not fully account for obesity and mental health woes, the Harvard team said. [3]

Let’s protect the future of humankind, our children!

Trump Warns Mexico: “Taken Advantage Of US For Long Enough… Must Change Now”

(We did not write this Article; the original Article is HERE)

Well, Trump slept on it, and… nothing changed.

Confirming that the tensions between the US and Mexico are only set to escalate after a diplomatically volatile day, in which president Pena Nieto unexpectedly pulled out of his Jan. 31 meeting with the US president, prompting the White House to first suggest it could impose a 20% border tax on Mexican imports, only to back off from the statement hours later, moments ago Trump tweeted that “Mexico has taken advantage of the U.S. for long enough. Massive trade deficits & little help on the very weak border must change, NOW!”

Can you spot when NAFTA was signed? (Hint: when the trade balance went red)

Interstingly, the peso is rallying  hard today, erasing most of yesterday’s losses from the constant headlines…

The tweet comes just hours ahead of Trump’s first official meeting with UK PM Theresa May, where the main topic, in addition to US support for NATO and Russia, will be trade.

Trump also brought up the topic of vote-rigging in his morning tweet-storm – ensuring the news cycle stays focused on it for the weekend…

Look forward to seeing final results of VoteStand. Gregg Phillips and crew say at least 3,000,000 votes were illegal. We must do better!

France: ‘Serious Consequences’ If Trump Moves Embassy To Jerusalem

(We did not write this article; the original article is HERE)

France warn Trump of 'serious consequences' if he moves embassy to Jerusalem

France are threatening President-elect Donald Trump with “serious consequences” if he moves the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. 

French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault warned Trump against the embassy move, saying that it would threaten peace in the region.

Yahoo News reports:

Speaking as 70 countries gather in Paris to try to revive Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts, Ayrault told French TV he believed Trump would find it “impossible” to fulfil the pledge he made during his campaign to transfer the embassy.

“When you are president of the United States, you cannot take such a stubborn and such a unilateral view on this issue. You have to try to create the conditions for peace,” Ayrault said.

Palestinian leader Mahmud Abbas warned Saturday that peace could be dealt a mortal blow if Trump, who has vowed unstinting support for Israel, moves the embassy to Jerusalem.

Doing so would reverse decades of US policy that has until now maintained that the final status of Jerusalem — whose eastern and largely Arab side has been occupied by Israel since 1967 — should be determined in peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

The Paris meeting is mainly symbolic, but comes at a crucial juncture for the Middle East, five days before Trump is sworn in as US president.